Digital ID for 13 year olds indicate the terrifying expansion plans for mass state monitoring and control
In just two weeks we have two more government outcomes for Digital ID with the controlling of your money and now the most horrific of all, state monitoring of our kids.
Well, it didn’t take long to materialise as we all knew it would. After the initial announcement by Keir Starmer just 2 weeks ago that Digital ID will be forced on all citizens of the UK to primarily address Illegal migration, which it obviously wont, it’s being expanded in scope with frightening speed.
Firstly, the statement from Home Secretary Yvette Cooper saying 13 year olds could be forced into having a Digital ID. Considering the initial pretence of Digital ID and its expansion in literally days, thinking that this ‘could be’ will change into a ‘will be’ is not a huge leap within time. Multiple Labour MPs are already stating they wish to crack down on children accessing social media and this is a way to achieve it. But it gets much worse.
She says Digital ID will help ‘standardise process’. It will do that, it will standardise and help to conform children and adults to a way of behaving and thinking that the government of the day considers to be acceptable. If you don’t conform you will be punished.
If we let Digital ID be rolled out to our children, it will be a huge overreach by Government into your family unit and how we all access the digital world. We believe;
They WILL control and monitor what material can be viewed on your child’s device and only government approved content will be accessible that will naturally be ideology biased.
They WILL monitor all instant messages, both sending and receiving, who their contacts are and reference their profile and their behaviour.
They WILL monitor where they are going, what they are doing, who they are with and at what times of the day.
You WILL get warnings on your phone on what the government think is appropriate behaviour including what time your child is out or who they are associating with.
You WILL have your own devices monitored and if there is evidence that a child is using your device you will be punished by having access to services withdrawn and fined via your CBDC.
You WILL receive visits from police or social workers if they consider your child behaviour is not in line with the government accepted narrative.
In short, if we let a Digital ID be implemented and extended to our children, the government will try to parent your children in the way they sees fit, not as you wish as their parent.
Secondly, and these two are related, is the Children’s Wellbeing & Schools Bill. Part of the bill states that a ‘consistent identifier for children’ will be used to bring information together on a child. In principle that sounds absolutely logical and could be beneficial to bring all information into one place for the benefit of linking heath, education and social care authorities together.
But there are suspicious areas of the bill. You cannot ask for, nor will it will ever be deleted. It’s not unreasonable to surmise this ‘consistent identifier’ that will follow them into adulthood will be their Digital ID. It’s an underhand disgraceful method to push the adoption of Digital ID forward for those children under 13 in all but name.
This bill gives new powers to local government to compile a database of detailed information on children, carers, parents and any other information that the government wish to force the parents to provide including their beliefs, behaviours and family contacts.
As we already know from the admission in the House of Commons by Jess Philips MP in 2025, there has been a major cover up by government for over 30 years regarding the mass grooming and gang rape of working class children in the care of the state, with some even being horrifically murdered. Authorities were complicit in the coverup from Police and Social Services to MPs and although denied, the Prime Minister himself. This does not fill us with confidence having a centralised database accessible by any government agency or 3rd party with thousands of children’s personal details contained within. Only this week we have yet another major hacking story from Discord with 70,000 users age verification data obtained after the introduction of the Data Use & Access Bill introduced this verification as mandatory.
Conclusion
As we always say, if you are a fan of this technology or government and consider our concerns scaremongering, consider the opposite.
If the UK had Prime Minister Nick Tenconi who is on the right wing of British politics rather than Keir Starmer on the left, would you want him and his team being in charge of monitoring you and your children’s life? Would you want them storing data on where your children are, what they are doing, where they are going, what they are spending, what they are messaging, controlling what they are watching and influencing all of those aspects of their digital life? I didn’t think so.
Digital ID needs stopping at all costs for everyone.